Frequently Asked Questions
1. If I file to renew my DEA registration
in advance of the expiration date and have not yet received
a decision on my renewal application prior to the expiration
date, may I continue to lawfully operate under my existing
DEA registration.
In general, yes. So long as you have
filed your registration renewal in advance of the expiration
date, you can continue to operate under your DEA registration
until such time that there is a final decision issued by
the DEA Deputy Administrator with respect to your renewal
application.
Registrants often question whether
a DEA registrant needs to submit a renewal application
at least 45 days in advance of the registration’s expiration date in order to
qualify for this provision. However, 21 C.F.R § 1301.36
and 21 C.F.R. § 1309.45, which require submission
of a registration-renewal application 45 days in advance
of the expiration of that registration renewal in order
to continue operations, only apply if the DEA registrant
has been issued or received a Show Cause Order. If
the registrant has not been issued a Show Cause Order,
then the registration renewal is considered timely filed
so long as it is filed in advance of the expiration date
of the DEA registration.
2. What does the Show Cause Order
hearing process involve?
The
Show Cause Order hearing process is divided into three
administrative levels. Once the Show Cause Order
has been issued, the registrant has 30 days within which
time to file a written hearing request. The process
is presided over by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”)
of the U.S. Department of Justice. The ALJ will issue
an order for prehearing statements and hold a prehearing
scheduling conference shortly thereafter. At this
conference, the ALJ will issue a date for each side to
file their prehearing statements and a hearing date on
the allegations in the Show Cause Order. The hearing
is adversarial in nature, and each side is permitted to
cross examine the other party’s witnesses. Parties
may also subpoena witnesses, but there is no formal right
to discovery, which is present in most other types of cases. The
ALJ hearing is not a jury trial. In most circumstances,
hearsay is also admissible at hearing.
Upon completion of the hearing, each side files their
proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the
ALJ’s consideration. Once the ALJ issues a
decision, each party has the right of appeal the ALJ’s
decision to the DEA Deputy Administrator. The DEA
Deputy Administrator will then issue its decision, which
becomes final absent an appeal to a Federal Circuit Court
of Appeals. If an adverse decision is issued by the
Deputy Administrator against the DEA registrant, the registrant
has the opportunity to file an appeal to the Federal Circuit
Court of Appeals in that registrant’s geographical
district. This may include filing an action for preliminary
injunction against the DEA Deputy Administrator in the
Circuit Court of Appeals to stay the decision of the DEA
Deputy Administrator.
3. What
factors are considered by the ALJ or Court in reviewing
a Show Cause Order?
There are four general statutory factors
which are considered in reviewing a Show Cause Order: (1) the
registrant’s maintenance of physical security and
controls to guard against diversion; (2) whether
the registrant has been convicted of a state or federal
crime involving a Controlled Substance or Listed Chemical;
(3) the registrant’s past experience with Controlled
Substances or Listed Chemicals; and (4) any other consideration
that is considered to be in “the public interest.” These
factors may vary some degree depending upon whether the
registrant is a manufacturer, distributor, or importer
of Controlled Substances or Listed Chemicals.
4. Are
there any sanctions other than DEA registration revocation,
which can be imposed in a Show Cause Hearing?
Yes. The ALJ and Courts generally
consider DEA registration revocation the most severe sanction,
which can be appropriate given egregious facts or repeat
violations. Other sanctions include a registration
term of probation; restrictions as to the type of Controlled
Substances and Listed Chemicals that the registrant can
manufacture, distribute, or import; imposition of additional
record keeping and reporting requirements to the DEA; or
increased audits and inspections of the registrant by its
local DEA field office.
5. I
have received a denial of my request for Controlled Substance
or Listed Chemical quota. How do I appeal that decision?
If the DEA has denied your request for a
Controlled Substance or Listed Chemical quota, or
has not awarded the quantity requested under the quota
application, the registrant may appeal the decision. The
appeal process is similar to that of the Show Cause Appeal
process. The registrant must request a hearing within
30 days of receipt of the quota decision. In general,
the burden is on the DEA to justify its denial of the quota
application or the amount awarded under the quota if the
amount awarded differs from that requested by the registrant.
6. If
a Show Cause Order has been served on the DEA registrant,
can it be resolved with the DEA without an administrative
hearing?
In some cases, yes. If a Show Cause
Order is issued and the registrant requests a hearing,
the DEA may consider entering into a Memorandum of Agreement
(“MOA”) with the registrant, if the DEA believes
feels the registrant has remedied the allegations and deficiencies,
identified in the Show Cause Order. The MOA will
often contain a probationary term and restrictions outlined
above. If the registrant fails to comply with the
terms of the MOA, the DEA reserves the right to reinstitute
proceedings under the Show Cause Order.
7. What
proactive steps can be taken to help guard against regulatory
violations and the issuance of a Show Cause Order?
As a registrant, it is increasingly important
to maintain an open and cooperative dialog with your local
and regional DEA field office, as well as to be proactive
in regulatory compliance. Any agreement with the
DEA to remedy any alleged regulatory deficiency must be
satisfied. Registrants should consider seeking various
certifications and audits and review by controlled substance
auditing firms. Various third-parties also offer
accreditation programs. If the DEA does issue a Show
Cause Order, it is important to be able to establish that
the registrant maintains a detailed and proactive regulatory
compliance program.
8. If
the Government initiates an action alleging civil violations
of the Controlled Substance Act, what fine can I expect
to pay?
The
statutory maximum penalties for civil regulatory infractions
are quite high. The maximum statutory penalties for
certain violations range from $10,000 - $25,000 per
violation. Some criminal and some civil violations
also carry greater fines up to $250,000 per violation. However,
simply because there is a regulatory infraction does not
mean that the Government will be awarded the statutory
maximum penalties. In order to recover for a civil
regulatory infraction, the Government must file a civil
lawsuit in Federal District Court. The Government
must prove that a violation occurred and must demonstrate
the appropriate fine for that violation. Courts consider
four factors in determining what fines to impose (1) the
willfulness of the violation; (2) the extent to which the
registrant profited from the violation; (3) the registrant’s
ability to pay a fine; and (4) the harm caused to the public
by the violation.
However, in recent months, the Government has entered
into agreements with large pharmaceutical distributors
and pharmacies where the entities have agreed to pay fines
of several million dollars relating to allegations that
they violated the statutes and regulations of the Controlled
Substance Act.
9. If
I want to sell or acquire a business that has a DEA registration,
is that registration transferable?
As
a general matter, DEA registrations are not transferable
without prior approval by the DEA. Registration transfers
are treated and reviewed as if they were applications for
a new DEA registration and are held to the same burden
of proof.
10. What
is my obligation as a DEA Registrant to monitor and report
suspicious sales of Controlled Substances or Listed Chemicals?
DEA
registrants have an obligation to monitor their sales of
Controlled Substances and Listed Chemicals to their customers
for potential diversion. Registrants have an obligation
to report orders involving extraordinary quantities of
these substances, and facts or circumstances that would
lead the registrant to conclude that customer’s order
is suspicious. The DEA has published and revised guidelines
over the past few years relating to factors to be considered
in determining and evaluating “suspicious orders.” In
recent years, the DEA has initiated immediate license revocation
proceedings based upon the registrant’s failure to
timely identify and file suspicious order reports with
the DEA.